Priyamvada Natarajan
Joseph S. and Sophia S. Fruton Professor of Astronomy and Professor of PhysicsCards
About
Research
Publications
2024
Mass and light in galaxy clusters: The case of Abell 370
Limousin M, Beauchesne B, Niemiec A, Diego J, Jauzac M, Koekemoer A, Sharon K, Acebron A, Lagattuta D, Mahler G, Williams L, Richard J, Jullo E, Furtak L, Faisst A, Frye B, Hibon P, Natarajan P, Rich M. Mass and light in galaxy clusters: The case of Abell 370. Astronomy & Astrophysics 2024, 693: a33. DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451969.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDark matter clumpsDark matter componentCold dark matterMatter clumpsStellar counterpartsDark matterMatter componentGalaxy clustersGravitational telescopesMass modelSelf-interacting DM modelsJames Webb Space TelescopeStudies of galaxy clustersHypothetical dark matterDark matter distributionGalaxy cluster AbellStrong-lensing modelsClass of modelsStrong lensing dataCluster AbellSpace TelescopeStellar distributionMass clumpsLensing dataObservational constraintsBUFFALO wild wings: A high precision free-form lens model of MACSJ0416 with constraints on dark matter from substructure and highly magnified Arcs
Perera D, Williams L, Liesenborgs J, Kelly P, Taft S, Li S, Jauzac M, Diego J, Natarajan P, Steinhardt C, Faisst A, Rich R, Limousin M. BUFFALO wild wings: A high precision free-form lens model of MACSJ0416 with constraints on dark matter from substructure and highly magnified Arcs. Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society 2024, stae2753. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stae2753.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchObservational Signatures of AGN Feedback in the Morphology and the Ionization States of Milky Way-like Galaxies
Qutob N, Emami R, Su K, Smith R, Hernquist L, Triani D, Hummels C, Fielding D, Hopkins P, Somerville R, Ballantyne D, Vogelsberger M, Tremblay G, Steiner J, Finkbeiner D, Narayan R, Park M, Grindlay J, Natarajan P, Hayward C, Kereš D, Ponnada S, Belli S, Davies R, Maheson G, Bugiani L, Li Y. Observational Signatures of AGN Feedback in the Morphology and the Ionization States of Milky Way-like Galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal 2024, 977: 72. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8658.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCosmic ray jetsInterstellar mediumO VIIIMg IISignatures of AGN feedbackIsolated galaxy simulationsIsotropic ion distributionsLow-energy ionsHigh-energy ionsGalactic nucleiStellar feedbackAGN feedbackObservational signaturesHalo massGalaxy simulationsJet powerEnergy ionsJet modelHigh energyDensity profileIonization stateFlux levelsAGNIon distributionCore densityMultizone Modeling of Black Hole Accretion and Feedback in 3D GRMHD: Bridging Vast Spatial and Temporal Scales
Cho H, Prather B, Su K, Narayan R, Natarajan P. Multizone Modeling of Black Hole Accretion and Feedback in 3D GRMHD: Bridging Vast Spatial and Temporal Scales. The Astrophysical Journal 2024, 977: 200. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9561.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchSupermassive black holesGeneral relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) simulationsModels of black hole accretionSimulate accretionMass accretion rate MBlack hole accretionShort-timescale variabilityGravitational radiiMagnetized gasGalactic potentialGalactic scalesBlack holeBondi radiusGalaxy simulationsDensity scalingAccretionEnergy feedbackDynamic steady stateBondiRadiusSteady stateGRMHDR-BDynamic rangeStateAstrometric Jitter as a Detection Diagnostic for Recoiling and Slingshot Supermassive Black Hole Candidates
Uppal A, Ward C, Gezari S, Natarajan P, Chen N, LaChance P, Di Matteo T. Astrometric Jitter as a Detection Diagnostic for Recoiling and Slingshot Supermassive Black Hole Candidates. The Astrophysical Journal 2024, 975: 286. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7ff0.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchActive galactic nucleiSupermassive black holesLegacy Survey of Space and TimeAstrometric jitterPan-STARRS1Evolution of binary supermassive black holesBinary supermassive black holesSupermassive black hole candidatesGravitational wave recoilKeck LRIS spectroscopyBlack hole candidatesInner accretion diskSpace and TimeOptical survey dataGalactic centerGalactic nucleiAccretion diskGalaxy mergersSlingshot mechanismAGN candidatesBlack holeSpin evolutionLegacy SurveyMagnitude limitStudy feedback effectsEfficient Survey Design for Finding High-redshift Galaxies with JWST
Vujeva L, Steinhardt C, Jespersen C, Frye B, Koekemoer A, Natarajan P, Faisst A, Hibon P, Furtak L, Atek H, Cen R, Sneppen A. Efficient Survey Design for Finding High-redshift Galaxies with JWST. The Astrophysical Journal 2024, 974: 23. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad639d.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchNIRCam moduleGalaxy clustersLensing cluster fieldsHubble Space TelescopeMassive galaxy clustersBlank field surveysForeground galaxy clustersHigh-redshift galaxiesSpace TelescopeLensing clustersRedshift rangeSurvey strategyCluster fieldsJWSTSurvey depthGalaxiesSource planeHigh magnification factorObservational programMagnification factorLarge-areaHubbleImage planeNIRCamTelescopeLoVoCCS. II. Weak Lensing Mass Distributions, Red-sequence Galaxy Distributions, and Their Alignment with the Brightest Cluster Galaxy in 58 Nearby X-Ray-luminous Galaxy Clusters
Fu S, Dell’Antonio I, Escalante Z, Nelson J, Englert A, Helhoski S, Shinde R, Brockland J, LaDuca P, Larkin C, Paris L, Weiner S, Black W, Chary R, Clowe D, Cooper M, Donahue M, Evrard A, Lacy M, Lauer T, Liu B, McCleary J, Meneghetti M, Miyatake H, Montes M, Natarajan P, Ntampaka M, Pierpaoli E, Postman M, Sohn J, Turner D, Umetsu K, Utsumi Y, Wilson G. LoVoCCS. II. Weak Lensing Mass Distributions, Red-sequence Galaxy Distributions, and Their Alignment with the Brightest Cluster Galaxy in 58 Nearby X-Ray-luminous Galaxy Clusters. The Astrophysical Journal 2024, 974: 69. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad67c6.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchBrightest cluster galaxiesRed-sequenceCluster galaxiesMass distributionCluster fieldsGalaxy distributionX-ray luminous galaxy clustersLong-term dynamical evolutionMedian misalignment angleDark Energy CameraGalaxy cluster fieldsWeak gravitational lensingWeak lensing analysisLensing mass distributionGalaxy shape noiseCluster mass distributionCosmic timescalesGalaxy clustersGravitational lensingLensing analysisAperture massGalaxiesAB magnitudeDynamic evolutionShape noiseForecasting galaxy cluster H i mass recovery with CHIME at redshifts z = 1 and 2 via the IllustrisTNG simulations
Polzin A, Newburgh L, Natarajan P, Chen H. Forecasting galaxy cluster H i mass recovery with CHIME at redshifts z = 1 and 2 via the IllustrisTNG simulations. Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society 2024, 533: 1852-1864. DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stae1919.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchCanadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping ExperimentGalaxy clustersIntensity mapsFunction of redshiftIntensity Mapping ExperimentRedshift galaxy clustersGalaxy cluster catalogCluster member galaxiesH i contentNeutral hydrogen contentCluster catalogIntermediate redshiftsGalaxy populationNorthern skyRedshift z=1IllustrisTNG simulationsMember galaxiesStacking analysisPrimary beamGalaxiesRedshiftCross-correlationSpatial resolutionHydrogen fluxIllustrisTNGErratum: “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics” (2023, ApJL 951 L11)
Afzal A, Agazie G, Anumarlapudi A, Archibald A, Arzoumanian Z, Baker P, Bécsy B, Blanco-Pillado J, Blecha L, Boddy K, Brazier A, Brook P, Burke-Spolaor S, Burnette R, Case R, Charisi M, Chatterjee S, Chatziioannou K, Cheeseboro B, Chen S, Cohen T, Cordes J, Cornish N, Crawford F, Cromartie H, Crowter K, Cutler C, DeCesar M, DeGan D, Demorest P, Deng H, Dolch T, Drachler B, von Eckardstein R, Ferrara E, Fiore W, Fonseca E, Freedman G, Garver-Daniels N, Gentile P, Gersbach K, Glaser J, Good D, Guertin L, Gültekin K, Hazboun J, Hourihane S, Islo K, Jennings R, Johnson A, Jones M, Kaiser A, Kaplan D, Kelley L, Kerr M, Key J, Laal N, Lam M, Lamb W, Lazio T, Lee V, Lewandowska N, dos Santos R, Littenberg T, Liu T, Lorimer D, Luo J, Lynch R, Ma C, Madison D, McEwen A, McKee J, McLaughlin M, McMann N, Meyers B, Meyers P, Mingarelli C, Mitridate A, Nay J, Natarajan P, Ng C, Nice D, Ocker S, Olum K, Pennucci T, Perera B, Petrov P, Pol N, Radovan H, Ransom S, Ray P, Romano J, Sardesai S, Schmiedekamp A, Schmiedekamp C, Schmitz K, Schröder T, Schult L, Shapiro-Albert B, Siemens X, Simon J, Siwek M, Stairs I, Stinebring D, Stovall K, Stratmann P, Sun J, Susobhanan A, Swiggum J, Taylor J, Taylor S, Trickle T, Turner J, Unal C, Vallisneri M, Verma S, Vigeland S, Wahl H, Wang Q, Witt C, Wright D, Young O, Zurek K, Collaboration T. Erratum: “The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics” (2023, ApJL 951 L11). The Astrophysical Journal Letters 2024, 971: l27. DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad68fc.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchDAVOS: Dwarf Active Galactic Nuclei from Variability for the Origins of Seeds: Properties of Variability-selected Active Galactic Nuclei in the COSMOS Field and Expectations for the Rubin Observatory
Burke C, Liu Y, Ward C, Liu X, Natarajan P, Greene J. DAVOS: Dwarf Active Galactic Nuclei from Variability for the Origins of Seeds: Properties of Variability-selected Active Galactic Nuclei in the COSMOS Field and Expectations for the Rubin Observatory. The Astrophysical Journal 2024, 971: 140. DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad54ca.Peer-Reviewed Original ResearchActive galactic nucleiBlack holeGalactic NucleiCOSMOS fieldIntermediate-mass black hole candidatesHost galaxy stellar massVirial black hole massesVariable active galactic nucleiHyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic ProgramBroad-line widthsStellar mass relationBlack hole candidatesBlack hole massCentral black holeHigh-precision photometryGalaxy stellar massStellar mass estimatesLow-mass galaxiesEarly-type galaxiesSubaru Strategic ProgramBroad-lineHole massStellar massActive galaxiesMass relation